dghubble/tarpoon
1
0
Fork 0
forked from barak/tarpoon
Code Releases Activity

Add glide.yaml and vendor deps

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Dalton Hubble 2016-12-03 22:43:32 -08:00
parent db918f12ad
commit 5b3d5e81bd
18880 changed files with 5166045 additions and 1 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

31
vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/examples/kubectl-container/README.md generated vendored Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
To access the Kubernetes API [from a Pod](../../docs/user-guide/accessing-the-cluster.md#accessing-the-api-from-a-pod) one of the solution is to run `kubectl proxy` in a so-called sidecar container within the Pod. To do this, you need to package `kubectl` in a container. It is useful when service accounts are being used for accessing the API and the old no-auth KUBERNETES_RO service is not available. Since all containers in a Pod share the same network namespace, containers will be able to reach the API on localhost.
This example contains a [Dockerfile](Dockerfile) and [Makefile](Makefile) for packaging up `kubectl` into
a container and pushing the resulting container image on the Google Container Registry. You can modify the Makefile to push to a different registry if needed.
Assuming that you have checked out the Kubernetes source code and setup your environment to be able to build it. The typical build step of this kubectl container will be:
$ cd examples/kubectl-container
$ make kubectl
$ make tag
$ make container
$ make push
It is not currently automated as part of a release process, so for the moment
this is an example of what to do if you want to package `kubectl` into a
container and use it within a pod.
In the future, we may release consistently versioned groups of containers when
we cut a release, in which case the source of gcr.io/google_containers/kubectl
would become that automated process.
[```pod.json```](pod.json) is provided as an example of running `kubectl` as a sidecar
container in a Pod, and to help you verify that `kubectl` works correctly in
this configuration. To launch this Pod, you will need a configured Kubernetes endpoint and `kubectl` installed locally, then simply create the Pod:
$ kubectl create -f pod.json
<!-- BEGIN MUNGE: GENERATED_ANALYTICS -->
[![Analytics](https://kubernetes-site.appspot.com/UA-36037335-10/GitHub/examples/kubectl-container/README.md?pixel)]()
<!-- END MUNGE: GENERATED_ANALYTICS -->