barak/cayley
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Releases Wiki Activity

Rename Check-ish -> Contains-ish

Browse source 
Contains[*] indicates what the check is for.

[*] I considered Has/Have, but settled on Contains to avoid confusion
with the HasA iterator.
This commit is contained in:
kortschak 2014-07-31 15:29:42 +09:30
parent a81005ba21
commit 1606e98d9f
20 changed files with 142 additions and 143 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

12
graph/iterator/optional_iterator.go
View file

@ -100,11 +100,11 @@ func (it *Optional) SubIterators() []graph.Iterator {
return nil
}
// Check() is the real hack of this iterator. It always returns true, regardless
// Contains() is the real hack of this iterator. It always returns true, regardless
// of whether the subiterator matched. But we keep track of whether the subiterator
// matched for results purposes.
func (it *Optional) Check(val graph.Value) bool {
checked := it.subIt.Check(val)
func (it *Optional) Contains(val graph.Value) bool {
checked := it.subIt.Contains(val)
it.lastCheck = checked
it.result = val
return true
@ -146,9 +146,9 @@ func (it *Optional) Optimize() (graph.Iterator, bool) {
func (it *Optional) Stats() graph.IteratorStats {
subStats := it.subIt.Stats()
return graph.IteratorStats{
CheckCost: subStats.CheckCost,
NextCost: int64(1 << 62),
Size: subStats.Size,
ContainsCost: subStats.ContainsCost,
NextCost: int64(1 << 62),
Size: subStats.Size,
}
}