barak/cayley
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Releases Wiki Activity

Rename Check-ish -> Contains-ish

Browse source 
Contains[*] indicates what the check is for.

[*] I considered Has/Have, but settled on Contains to avoid confusion
with the HasA iterator.
This commit is contained in:
kortschak 2014-07-31 15:29:42 +09:30
parent a81005ba21
commit 1606e98d9f
20 changed files with 142 additions and 143 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

16
graph/iterator/all_iterator.go
View file

@ -126,16 +126,16 @@ func (it *Int64) Size() (int64, bool) {
return Size, true
}
// Check() for an Int64 is merely seeing if the passed value is
// Contains() for an Int64 is merely seeing if the passed value is
// withing the range, assuming the value is an int64.
func (it *Int64) Check(tsv graph.Value) bool {
graph.CheckLogIn(it, tsv)
func (it *Int64) Contains(tsv graph.Value) bool {
graph.ContainsLogIn(it, tsv)
v := tsv.(int64)
if it.min <= v && v <= it.max {
it.result = v
return graph.CheckLogOut(it, v, true)
return graph.ContainsLogOut(it, v, true)
}
return graph.CheckLogOut(it, v, false)
return graph.ContainsLogOut(it, v, false)
}
// The type of this iterator is an "all". This is important, as it puts it in
@ -150,8 +150,8 @@ func (it *Int64) Optimize() (graph.Iterator, bool) { return it, false }
func (it *Int64) Stats() graph.IteratorStats {
s, _ := it.Size()
return graph.IteratorStats{
CheckCost: 1,
NextCost: 1,
Size: s,
ContainsCost: 1,
NextCost: 1,
Size: s,
}
}